To test the hypothesis that irrational relationship beliefs related to perceived parent-adolescent relations and conflict resolution behaviors, Pearson Moment Correlations were calculated. The correlations among scores on the ICDS, CRS, MRS, FRS are presented in Table 1. 06, p>.236) and father-adolescent relations (r = .07, p>.229). 23, p<.001). Result showed that Interpersonal Rejection subscale of ICDS had highest correlation with CRS (r = -.44, p<. 001).

The individuals whose mediocre rating decrease above the median was basically branded since higher impaired matchmaking viewpoints group, and those which have an average score beneath the average was in fact labeled just like the reasonable impaired relationships beliefs class

In this study, it was expected that individuals with high dysfunctional beliefs would endorse more less conflict resolution behaviors and perceive theft relations with parents negatively than those of low dysfunctional beliefs. To test this hypothesis, the high and low irrational group were defined by a median split on the ICDS score (median = ). Multivariate analysis of variances was performed to determine whether individuals having high irrational relationship beliefs vary from those not having irrational relationship beliefs across MRS, FRS and CRS. The result of analyses revealed that contrary to hypothesis, there was christianmingle no significant group difference on mothers-adolescent relations (Wilks’ Lambda = .971, F =.77, p>.696) and father-adolescent relations (Wilks’ Lambda=.967, F = .88, p>.578). Consistent with the prediction, significant group difference was found on conflict resolution behaviors (Wilks’ Lambda = .896, F = 4.12, p<.001). When compared to individuals with high irrational beliefs about relationships, individuals with low irrational beliefs endorsed significantly more conflict resolution behaviors. Subsequent univariate results indicated that differences between low and high dysfunctional relationship beliefs groups were significant on focing other's needs (F = 9.77, p<.001), social adaptation (F = 9.82, p<.001) and anger management subscales (F = 3.97, p<.020) of CRS (Table 2).

Affirmed, bad and you will reasonable level connections ranging from dysfunctional relationship thinking and you can dispute solution behaviors was basically located (roentgen = -

Stepwise regression analyses was did to look at factors one expect seen parents-adolesents connections and you will conflict solution behaviors due to the fact built details. Independent parameters that have been significantly less than data was indeed intercourse, ages, kind of house, mother and father wedding, instructional level of parents, level of sister and sis therefore the acquisition from delivery, family unit members construction and you may impaired relationships viewpoints. To determine you’ll separate variables, first, Beta weights have been computed to the decide to try. The greatest contributing separate variables with the mainly based adjustable variance were integrated investigation. Techniques is actually ended immediately after also the independent details you to definitely contribute to the fresh informed me difference. As gender, academic level of parents and kind out-of residence was indeed categorical, these people were added onto regression research just after getting dummy coded (0 or step one).

Beta weights showed that beliefs about interpersonal rejection was the most significant predictor for conflict resolution behaviors. Results also showed that gender and the beliefs about interpersonal misperception were predictors of conflict resolution behaviors. Stepwise regression analysis to determine the best model in predicting for conflict resolution behaviors was completed in three stages. The beliefs about interpersonal rejection was entered in Step 1. The contribution of beliefs about interpersonal rejection was statistically significant, accounting for 20 % of the total variances, F = , p< .001. When gender was entered into the equation in Step 2, explained variance of CRS increased to 27 % from 20 %, F = , p< .001. Gender difference was found between men and women on conflict resolution behaviors. Women had significantly higher scores than men in CRS scores (t = 5.05, p<. 001).

In Step 3, the beliefs about interpersonal misperception were included and this variable explained 3 % of the variance, F = , p< .001. The beliefs about interpersonal rejection, interpersonal misperception and gender accounted for 31% of the variance.